Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous Entry | Next Entry

Osamu Tezuka's Buddha

I've been reading volume 1 of Osamu Tezuka's graphic novel Buddha, and I have to say I'm really torn about whether to buy the second volume or not. The subject matter interests me, of course, and I'm enjoying the story that's being told, but I'm just really not fond of the art style.

Sometimes, occasionally, the artwork is beautiful, but that's the rare exception. Mostly, the art is very cartoonish. And I'm not just talking about the actual drawing style, either -- I'm also talking about the visual concept for the story, how emotions are expressed, etc.

For example, there's a scene in which a woman is dying after giving birth to the infant who will one day be the Buddha. There are a few frames showing her pain, her servants' concern for her life, etc. ... and then there's a frame showing the servants carrying the sedan chair across a river, trying to get her home to her husband, the king, before she dies. But as they cross the river in a very cartoony panic, the frame is filled with the lyrics to "Row Row Row Your Boat."

As another example, when they do arrive back at the castle and the queen is on her deathbed, explaining weakly that she is dying, the king is drawn cross-eyed, leaping into the air and doing the splits as he asks what she's talking about. The surrounding panels are serious ... there's just this random guy suddenly leaping into the air with his legs flying in opposite directions. Sigh.

Now, it isn't that I have a problem with silliness. Ranma 1/2 is pretty darn silly most of the time. But it's a different kind of silliness, and it's fairly consistent. Nor do I take issue with Buddhism being presented lightly. That doesn't bother me at all, and in fact I find it sort of fun. What bugs me is that the tone is uneven, sort of awkwardly shifting around between serious and ridiculous. Shannon theorized that the strange juxtapositions are intended as a lesson in Buddhism, which Shannon summarized as "Lighten up." But I don't buy it. If that was the intention, it doesn't work for me.

I expect stories -- whether they're told in text, drawing, film, song, or whatever -- to somehow cohere. For example, a film such as American Splendor, which is told using many different media of different tones, has an overarching cohesion that creates a dense Gestalt. The diversity of the pieces only adds to the meaning of the whole.

I don't think that happens with Tezuka's Buddha. Instead, it reads as a bizarre mishmash of styles and tones. Personally, I find the over-the-top, Daffy Duck-style cartoonishness annoying. If the whole book were written/drawn in that style, I would never have gotten through it. As it is, I've almost finished reading volume 1, and I've enjoyed it for the story ... but I'm not sure whether I want to spend $25 on the next volume ... let alone an estimated $175 to buy 7 more volumes to read through to the end. I'm not sure. I'll have to think about it.

The idea still attracts me, but the execution isn't quite to my tastes. Unfortunately, there are other things I would probably rather be reading.



( 7 comments — Leave a comment )
Apr. 20th, 2004 11:49 pm (UTC)
Shannon theorized that the strange juxtapositions are intended as a lesson in Buddhism, which Shannon summarized as "Lighten up."

This sounded... familiar. {grin} Ah, snarky husbands. Sometimes you love 'em, sometimes you just wanna take 'em out back and beat the crap out of them...
Apr. 21st, 2004 12:09 am (UTC)
I was vaguely tempted by Buddha, but I think you've successfully put me off now.
Apr. 21st, 2004 12:32 am (UTC)
A lot of anime humor seems to consist of small girls going all super-crazy-bugeyed, jumping up and down and hitting people screaming "BAKKA BAKKA BAKKA BAKKA BAKKA!!!!" Maybe he's trying for comic relief in Buddha, and it just comes across as bizarre. That particular Japanese cultural trait puts me off much anime...
Apr. 21st, 2004 12:54 am (UTC)
One of the other things in manga/anime that tends to annoy me are the humorously lecherous characters played ad nauseum. Okay. I get it. He's a lecher. He's trying to peep at naked girls and/or girls in their underwear. I get it. Really I do. I got it the first 3000 times, too. Sigh.
Apr. 21st, 2004 02:22 am (UTC)
I think some of the off-puttingness may be that he was basically the founder of manga and anime in their modern forms, and that he was highly influenced by Disney (this would be post-War, in the fifties or so), which might explain the style -- the style that I'm used to in Ranma and etc. just hadn't developed yet.

As to the coherency of the vision, I haven't read it, so I can't say much!
Apr. 26th, 2004 11:35 am (UTC)
I've looked at it and haven't been attracted by the art - that's the first thing that makes me want to own a graphic novel, if the art is so beautiful that I must own it. (It's not the only thing, but it's the first thing.) I don't like the manga I've seen too much, and your description of the style confirms my feeling that although the subject interests me, I'll probably skip this one.
Apr. 26th, 2004 12:39 pm (UTC)
Yeah, I initially didn't buy this one on my own because I hated the cartoonish art. Shannon ended up giving it to me as a gift, because he thought I would enjoy the subject matter.

I must admit he was right on that score. But the art is so annoying that it really does detract from the story for me.
( 7 comments — Leave a comment )

Latest Month

April 2017


Powered by LiveJournal.com